<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bali BS</title>
	<link>http://blog.rogersradiointernet.com/richardzurawski/2007/12/07/bali-bs/</link>
	<description>Just another Rogers Radio Blog weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan McNamara</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersradiointernet.com/richardzurawski/2007/12/07/bali-bs/#comment-196</link>
		<author>Bryan McNamara</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 22:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersradiointernet.com/richardzurawski/2007/12/07/bali-bs/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Do you understand that scientists are saying CO2 levels rise as a result of an increase in planetary warming - not the opposite? Micheal Mann's "Hockey Stick" graph made famous in the science fiction film "An Inconvenient Truth" suggested that temperature rises AFTER CO2 levels rise when in fact, you can see on the graph that the opposite is true. CO2 levels rise as a result of temperature rise! 
Doesn't this punch a huge hole in the entire "man is causing global warming" argument? 
Also - Isn't it true that there were warmer periods during the "Medieval Warming Period" around the year 1500? The polar bears didn't die off then and man certainly didn't cause climate to change that far back - right? 
What evidence and papers do you have  - references please - that show inconclusively that man is causing global warming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you understand that scientists are saying CO2 levels rise as a result of an increase in planetary warming - not the opposite? Micheal Mann&#8217;s &#8220;Hockey Stick&#8221; graph made famous in the science fiction film &#8220;An Inconvenient Truth&#8221; suggested that temperature rises AFTER CO2 levels rise when in fact, you can see on the graph that the opposite is true. CO2 levels rise as a result of temperature rise!<br />
Doesn&#8217;t this punch a huge hole in the entire &#8220;man is causing global warming&#8221; argument?<br />
Also - Isn&#8217;t it true that there were warmer periods during the &#8220;Medieval Warming Period&#8221; around the year 1500? The polar bears didn&#8217;t die off then and man certainly didn&#8217;t cause climate to change that far back - right?<br />
What evidence and papers do you have  - references please - that show inconclusively that man is causing global warming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
