The Warlords. Out on DVD now. Somewhere. (*******7/10)
Tuesday, January 6th, 2009“A brother who hurts a brother must die.”
The Warlords is an in-depth examination of human nature. It features basically good men doing bad things, and basically bad men doing good things. It is a movie that looks at the bonds of brotherhood, whether that bond be by birth or by blood or by blood oath. It is a sweeping political and feudal epic set in Hong Kong in the late 1800s that delves deep into the political scene at the time, between Empresses, governors, military generals and faceless men behind the scenes. And it’s also a movie where a guy gets his torso blown graphically into tiny pieces thanks to a close-up encounter with a cannon.
The Warlords is all those things, and more. And less. It is so ambitious, and done on such a large scale, that it can’t possibly score on every front. The love-triangle, deception story, can’t possibly be fully fleshed out, so to speak, because that would mean there would be less time for limb-hacking and face-stabbing and all that Braveheart battle type stuff. The behind-the-scenes political manouevering must necessarily be touched on only briefly, because there just isn’t time to go fully into it. So the corruption and the backstabbing and the callousness of these people is treated as a de facto problem in life. Like, of course they are evil.
What really works, however, is the idea of the ends justifying the means. In a movie about love, war, politics, history and loyalty, only the loyalty and the war get really in-depth treatment. Even when the movie ends, we do not know if the ends for certain characters really justified their means. As in another Jet Li classic, Hero, we are left with a sense of sadness at the end of the movie (for different reasons - I’m not about to give away the ending to this one). We wonder whether the world is actually better off, and whether the characters we have come to know are better off.
But that’s another small problem with the film. We have indeed come to know the four central characters - three men who have taken a blood oath to be loyal to each other to the death, and the woman who throws a bit of a wrench into that whole plan. But we haven’t come to know them enough to necessarily like them. When they do good things, and make noble speeches, we think oh, OK. They’re doing a good thing. And when they do bad things and kill the wrong people, we think oh, OK. They’re doing something with which I don’t particularly agree. And we move on. If any of these characters were to die, I wouldn’t be terribly upset about it. They are not so sympathetic that I identify with any of them.
So, in some ways, The Warlords plays a little like a documentary. Of course it isn’t even a biopic or anything like that, but it moves in a workmanlike manner from one plot development to the next. Here is Jet Li getting to know the girl. Now he meets the bandits. He becomes blood brothers with them. He convinces them to join the army. They win a great victory and their families get fed. Now the politicians are playing sneaky games. Here comes another battle. And that’s all we really get. Which is fine, because I was totally blown away by the sweeping camera work, the massive battle scenes and the terrific lead actors (especially Li and Andy Lau, one of my favourite Hong Kong actors).
In the end, the message is fairly ambiguous, and that’s the way it should be. It makes you really think, and the final scenes (including one that is reminiscent of one of the coolest scenes in Cool Hand Luke) manage to conjure up some power that is surprising given the clinical nature of much of the rest of the movie. And by then, we have begun to really feel for one of the characters, who appears to slowly lose his mind as the movie goes on. The Warlords really is very good, and it should be watched, by fans of great sword-fighting action war historical political movies. Like a Chinese Braveheart. Only shorter. And not quite as good. The only real problem with The Warlords is that it bit off more than it could chew.