Journey to the Center of the Earth. Out Tuesday. (**2/10)
Sunday, October 26th, 2008Call me jaded. I probably am. But most of the time, I have a very easy time suspending my disbelief when movies get into out-of-this-world, totally-impossible territory. But it’s up to the movie to pull you in. And if you’re going to make, say, Spy Kids, you need to make this otherwordly scene so entertaining and captivating that people forget easily how implausible it is. Journey To The Center of the Earth is not one of those movies. I mean, if you’re going to create a world, at the center of the Earth, and have glow-in-the-dark birds and tyrannosaurs and gigantic sea monsters inhabit that world, that’s fine. But you must, in doing so, acknowledge that this is all scientifically impossible. I mean, the falling six thousand, four hundred kilometres to the center of the earth and surviving. The idea that being at the centre of the earth would not, in itself, kill you. And the idea that you could survive the trip back to the surface riding on a geyser. All of this is, I think we can all agree, scientifically impossible.
And that’s fine. Movies do not have to make scientific sense, or even attempt to be plausible. They are made for kids. And kids watch Space Chimps. But here’s the thing - if you’re the one making this film, you NEED to, at the very least, acknowledge that you are making something far, far outside the realm of realistic science. And in order to make that acknowledgement, ALL you have to do - ALL - is not call attention to it. Like, make your protagonist a kid, who falls down a really, really deep six thousand kilometre hole, into the centre of the Earth, and lands on…I don’t know…a marshmallow tree, and somehow survives. And then there is this massive world. That would be really, really easy to do.
The thing NOT to do is to make your protagonist a scientist. Or Brendan Fraser. In this case, Journey To The Center Of The Earth has made both mistakes at once. The protagonist IS Brendan Fraser. Playing a scientist. Who is constantly figuring out scientific things. Like, the walls are made of magnesium, and if you light magnesium with a match, it burns. This could come in handy. The geothermal winds are more powerful and strong than the surface winds, so we need to put our boat-kite way up in the air. The ground is made of tungsten calcite, and therefore is in imminent danger of collapsing. (I’m making up most of these words. I don’t remember the movie well enough and I don’t care enough about it to look them up.)
But the point I’m making is that if you’re going to make one of your characters a genius, you can only do so if your movie is also going to be smart. And if you are going to make one of your characters a scientist, your movie should at the very least be scientifically plausible. Make Brendan Fraser a crane operator, or a Wendy’s manager, and I would have much, much less of a problem with this movie.
Now, I must give the DVD some credit here - it comes with 3-D glasses, so if you wish you can put on those glasses and watch this movie in 3-D. And some of that is pretty cool. But even if those special effects were the greatest in movie history, I wouldn’t be willing to sit through this story, this script and this acting in order to find out. Skip this one, either way. Journey To The Centre of the Earth comes out October 28th from Paramount Home Entertainment.