The “vision thing”
Oft used in American politics is the phrase “the shining city on the hill.”
As Ronald Reagan emphasized, “America is a shining city upon a hill whose beacon light guides freedom-loving people everywhere.”
In his farewell address to the nation, Reagan expanded upon his romantic proclamation of cityhood and statehood and brotherhood: “I’ve spoken of the Shining City all my political life. …In my mind it was a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, windswept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace; a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity. And if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here. That’s how I saw it, and see it still.’”
While the American rhetoric of the ‘shining city upon a hill’ seems, to the Candian ear, patriotically florid, perhaps a little bit of idealsim and civic patriotism might go a long way here.
Halifax you say? Thee of the navel-gazing cat by-laws and backyard chicken flutters?
Yes, Halifax. Where, like most places, there is an inferiority complex, lassitude, complacency, and good, old-fashioned, fear and loathing.
If ever there was a shining beacon upon a hill, dramatically introduced by the slap of a cold, great ocean upon a face, a face of rock, this is it – Halifax.
It is a hill with a city around it that looms out over the sea; peering at passing ships and greeting every Canadian ancestor that ever came from Europe. Almost all of us.
It is a city that you cannot even blow up by accident.
Back in 1917 the snow fell like white blankets around the wounded buildings whose remains stood skelatol and blackened, but still there. And the people still came and gathered, and fell around the twisted husks like the snow itself. Even the great Halifax explosion only inspired us to hang on.
And as silly and as ornamental as American political phrasing seems to us often times, we need not turn up our nose up at it or risk losing an important lesson — the lessons of our own stories, our own legacies, our own mythologies, and, yes, our own flushed and florid blarney.
As self-evident and filled with blatant trusims as pep talks often are, where, when we hear the truth we know it, and where we recognize that which we need to do better while also acknowledging the mettle of which we are made, we still need to hear it.
Halifax, itself, needs a pep talk.
The Citizens for Halifax Society ( www.citizensforhalifax.ca) spoke to me this week. Urban planner and caring visonary, Patricia Busby joined me on air to discuss the direction of Halifax and the whole notion of “the vision thing”.
According to Busby, we lack vision. We have, and I will paraphrase, “pothole Mayoral mentalities”. Which is a shame, because the potholes are so big around Halifax right now they could house entire shipments of stowaway Algerians. But instead of “cover your ass” career pothole politicians and councillors, we need people (Mayors, councillors, business leaders) who take the risks necessary inherent in leadership.
A case in point is Trade Centre CEO and Commonwealth Games bid leader Fred MacGillivray. He and his team got the bid for Canada, and especially for Halifax, and yet was, in my opinion, stabbed in the back.
But Fred MacGillivray’s disheartening battle should not discourage others (it was never about money, there were always ways around that issue arding to me; money was used as an excuse to steal thunder) – others who care and who need to lead.
When you lead, even in a democracy, you push people out of the way. People get offended. Noses get out of joint. How do you think the original pioneers did it? By pretty-pleasing everyone?
It is gumption and backbone that dug out the stumps and cleared the land. The notion of American and British exceptionalism (something from which we may re-learn) began, for America, in the late 15th century when America was no more than a gleam in Christopher Columbus’s eye.
In 1630, a wealthy attorney named John Winthrop took a group of fellow Puritans across the Atlantic to build a New Jurusalem in the New World. From the book of Matthew’s Sermon On The Mount, Winthrop characterized their new homeland and their new adventure as “a city upon a hill”.
Equally a blessing, equally an opportunity, Halifax has all the right ingredients.
Just add some heart and stir.
And don’t let the turkeys get you down (Reagan said that too).
March 26th, 2008 at 12:27 pm
There’s too much talk and never enough action in this city. Halifax has the potential to be a great City, but we need someone with the courage to step up, get things done and move this city forward.
Among the major issues being tabled right now are better metro transit, a third crossing, a new Trade Centre and new stadium. Moving forward with these issues (rather than continuously dragging our feet through the mud) could really help improve this city.
March 28th, 2008 at 10:34 am
Andrew I was listening in on your program about traffic congestion in Halifax. I emailed you as I was unable to call in:
How to fight traffic congestion?
Active transportation is a great way to improve so much of our lifestyle, addressing environment, congestion and health of population, yet Halifax is NOT set-up to accommodate safe active transportation. Cyclists cannot get from point A to point B on a bike “route”. What is currently labeled a bike “route”, is a series of bike lanes that stop and start abruptly and do NOT connect.
There is nowhere in the city that I feel SAFE cycling with my children - we stay on the sidewalks as much as possible (even when I am towing them in our very sturdy bike trailer).
Additionally, it is not possible to bus partway for those with longer commutes because it is not possible to predict which bus on which route has a bike rack that can accommodate cyclists. Imagine cycling from Saint Margaret’s Bay, expecting to hop on a bus for part o the route, waiting for the bus and seeing that the one that arrives does not have a bike rack?! My friends and I have called metro transit info line to inquire and been told that they do not have any record of which buses are equipped with bike racks. Not only that but there is no bus route upon which ALL buses are equipped, so it’s a guessing game.
It is not possible for me in Clayton Park to bike to Burnside for instance, without biking all the way downtown, taking the McDonald and biking all the way back out to Burnside. Why? There are no bike lanes on the McKay, and bikes are not allowed on Magazine Hill. And as I mentioned it is not possible to rely on bus for part of the route.
Roads are being widened to make more room for cars (like Chebucto) - yet the safer and more sustainable option would be to put in bike lanes, increase the access to buses for all, and provide incentives to get people out of their cars!
March 28th, 2008 at 3:31 pm
What was up with cutting the Science Files short this friday for Ben Mulroney who cares about him? oh yeah Mcribs…. lame I want to be informed don’t turn and start moving with the flow of the rest of mainstream media who focus on celebritys and talk for a half hour about how someone rolled up their rim….
I want to hear about science, politics, economics and important local and international issues not about Ben Mulroney and some guy who won a car.
March 29th, 2008 at 3:12 pm
Halifax was moving forward quite nicelyuntil the last few years with the collapse of the CWG’s and heritage groups fighting against downtown development and a mayor who has lost his way we seem to have stalled out a bit. You’re right we need vision and we have all the ingredients to be a great city, the best in the country in my opinion. The economy is doing great and we are a growing city with great energy and feel. If we can just channel that the sky’s the limit.
March 31st, 2008 at 6:18 am
Yet chickens and cats and concerts will get far more public attention then any of the major issues being tabled.