<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s afraid of Ahmadinejad?</title>
	<link>http://blog.rogersradiointernet.com/andrewkrystal/2007/09/25/whos-afraid-of-ahmadinejad/</link>
	<description>Just another Rogers Radio Blog weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Gord Billington</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersradiointernet.com/andrewkrystal/2007/09/25/whos-afraid-of-ahmadinejad/#comment-388</link>
		<author>Gord Billington</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersradiointernet.com/andrewkrystal/2007/09/25/whos-afraid-of-ahmadinejad/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>Ahmadinejad seems to be taking his cues from Kim Jong Il, he gives a distinct impression from his actions and statements, that he wants to be seen, as an unpredictable foe. His acceptance of his American demonization could be a calculated attempt to defend his country, from the meddling of an American government, who is set on correcting, the political and social issues of any country, who by no fault of their own, have ended up, situated over large oil deposits.

The threat implied by his nuclear desires, could be seen as trump card, because the only thing worse than a madman, is a madman with nuclear weapons. 

Provided they managed to develop their nuclear program to the point they could create a weapon, under the intense scrutiny they currently bear, at best, they could only come up with a single strike opportunity. Which most likely would be aimed at Israel, unless they choose to use terrorist tactics to attack the U.S. 

 It would seem like suicide. What man, in his right mind, would launch one of these attacks? Only one who seems to be evil persona or a sociopath, willingly turning his own people into martyrs, against the great infidels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmadinejad seems to be taking his cues from Kim Jong Il, he gives a distinct impression from his actions and statements, that he wants to be seen, as an unpredictable foe. His acceptance of his American demonization could be a calculated attempt to defend his country, from the meddling of an American government, who is set on correcting, the political and social issues of any country, who by no fault of their own, have ended up, situated over large oil deposits.</p>
<p>The threat implied by his nuclear desires, could be seen as trump card, because the only thing worse than a madman, is a madman with nuclear weapons. </p>
<p>Provided they managed to develop their nuclear program to the point they could create a weapon, under the intense scrutiny they currently bear, at best, they could only come up with a single strike opportunity. Which most likely would be aimed at Israel, unless they choose to use terrorist tactics to attack the U.S. </p>
<p> It would seem like suicide. What man, in his right mind, would launch one of these attacks? Only one who seems to be evil persona or a sociopath, willingly turning his own people into martyrs, against the great infidels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian P.</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersradiointernet.com/andrewkrystal/2007/09/25/whos-afraid-of-ahmadinejad/#comment-382</link>
		<author>Damian P.</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersradiointernet.com/andrewkrystal/2007/09/25/whos-afraid-of-ahmadinejad/#comment-382</guid>
		<description>Conservative Iranian-American blogger Pejman Yousefzadeh explains why he's glad Ahmadinejad got the chance to speak (and make a fool of himself):

http://www.chequer-board.net/story/2007/9/25/1622/12919

"I don't want to make it sound as if Ahmadinejad didn't have his fans at the event. He did. But here's the thing: If he were prevented from speaking at Columbia, barring a Presidential order that would have restricted his travel at the United States, it is entirely possible that he would have set up a meeting between himself and his fans in New York and won a propaganda victory. Even if his travel were restricted, he could have set up such a meeting at the Iranian mission to the United Nations. And he would have enjoyed and profited mightily from that gathering.

Instead, Ahmadinejad was forced to deal with boos, hisses, righteous denunciations and derisive laughter when he sought desperately to convince the audience that there are no homosexuals in Iran. And don't think for a moment that this is a temporary embarrassment. Quite the contrary; the pictures of Ahmadinejad being booed and lectured will somehow, some way, find their way to the satellite dishes of ordinary Iranians. They will see unedited pictures of their country's president being brought to account for his murderous and ignorant impulses. And the very sensible Iranians--the millions of them--that President Bollinger rightfully praised in his speech, will find themselves fortified against their and our common foe.

So colour me happy that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad got to speak at Columbia. Were I assured that he would receive similar treatment at other institutions of higher learning, I would hope that he would make a cross-country college campus tour while in the United States.

After all, when a bad man asks to be hanged, you don't deny him the rope. Do you?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservative Iranian-American blogger Pejman Yousefzadeh explains why he&#8217;s glad Ahmadinejad got the chance to speak (and make a fool of himself):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chequer-board.net/story/2007/9/25/1622/12919" rel="nofollow">http://www.chequer-board.net/story/2007/9/25/1622/12919</a></p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t want to make it sound as if Ahmadinejad didn&#8217;t have his fans at the event. He did. But here&#8217;s the thing: If he were prevented from speaking at Columbia, barring a Presidential order that would have restricted his travel at the United States, it is entirely possible that he would have set up a meeting between himself and his fans in New York and won a propaganda victory. Even if his travel were restricted, he could have set up such a meeting at the Iranian mission to the United Nations. And he would have enjoyed and profited mightily from that gathering.</p>
<p>Instead, Ahmadinejad was forced to deal with boos, hisses, righteous denunciations and derisive laughter when he sought desperately to convince the audience that there are no homosexuals in Iran. And don&#8217;t think for a moment that this is a temporary embarrassment. Quite the contrary; the pictures of Ahmadinejad being booed and lectured will somehow, some way, find their way to the satellite dishes of ordinary Iranians. They will see unedited pictures of their country&#8217;s president being brought to account for his murderous and ignorant impulses. And the very sensible Iranians&#8211;the millions of them&#8211;that President Bollinger rightfully praised in his speech, will find themselves fortified against their and our common foe.</p>
<p>So colour me happy that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad got to speak at Columbia. Were I assured that he would receive similar treatment at other institutions of higher learning, I would hope that he would make a cross-country college campus tour while in the United States.</p>
<p>After all, when a bad man asks to be hanged, you don&#8217;t deny him the rope. Do you?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.rogersradiointernet.com/andrewkrystal/2007/09/25/whos-afraid-of-ahmadinejad/#comment-368</link>
		<author>Mark</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rogersradiointernet.com/andrewkrystal/2007/09/25/whos-afraid-of-ahmadinejad/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, it is not a question of being afraid of Ahmadinejad. The following is taken from an article written by two Columbia undergrads, and which explains my viewpoint:

"Columbia properly considers free speech its ultimate value. Universities should not try to shield students from controversial views or be fearful of any ideas. But this is beside the point. By its invitation, Columbia has chosen to give Ahmadinejad a valuable political gift that he does not deserve, and that he will use to further repress his people and threaten his neighbours. It is shameful to receive him here as an official guest."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, it is not a question of being afraid of Ahmadinejad. The following is taken from an article written by two Columbia undergrads, and which explains my viewpoint:</p>
<p>&#8220;Columbia properly considers free speech its ultimate value. Universities should not try to shield students from controversial views or be fearful of any ideas. But this is beside the point. By its invitation, Columbia has chosen to give Ahmadinejad a valuable political gift that he does not deserve, and that he will use to further repress his people and threaten his neighbours. It is shameful to receive him here as an official guest.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
